The select image in categorys

by **QTips** on Sun Feb 13, 2005 1:20 pm

Can we have this ontop of covers instead of behind ?

by **Colby** on Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:56 pm

Amen BROTHER!!!!
Bump!
we can always make our selector squares "donuts" if we dont want them to cover the art.

by **QTips** on Mon Feb 14, 2005 6:21 pm

exactly!
me to thought donuts for such scenario

by **stevenhanna6** on Wed Feb 16, 2005 8:20 pm

i have a stupid question, why would you want it "on top" you be able to see the cover art. Its very easy to do, I just see why you would want to do it.

by **Colby** on Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:30 pm

Steve youre right, that was a stupid question.

Is this simple enough for you?

by **jowaldo** on Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:48 pm

I'm assuming tho if this was changed that it would effect selector shapes too instead of just images. I use shapes that go behind the coverart.. if it was changed to be on top, I couldn't use shapes anymore.. The best would be if it was an option to choose whether its on top or not.

by **QTips** on Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:51 pm

Ontop I can make a selector that just fade the cover or a cool overlay like in the Colby example.The possibility of that would be creating many cool selectors

by **BaddaBing** on Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:55 pm

Looks cool, but I agree with Jowaldo - if implemented front/back should be a choice.

by **stevenhanna6** on Sat Feb 19, 2005 6:56 am

the way colby describes it makes perfect sense

now I see the light, very original idea. This is something other interfaces will copy I think.

Oh yah we can use both the one behind, and the new one that is in front. So we now have four things we can set

Selected
Unselected
SlectedAbove
UnselectedAbove

try it out.
http://www.xlobby.com/xlobby2.zip